Home Health News Experts Forcefully Push Back on Barrington Declaration

Experts Forcefully Push Back on Barrington Declaration

4 min read

A letter signed by 80 researchers says the idea put forth by the Great Barrington Declaration is “a dangerous fallacy.”

The herd immunity method championed by the Great Barrington Declaration would, if truly put into apply, show disastrous for society as a complete and the healthcare system particularly. That’s the message in a memorandum that was written by 80 worldwide researchers and revealed in The Lancet this week. That open letter, referred to as the John Snow Memorandum, warns {that a} herd immunity method to managing COVID-19 by permitting immunity to develop in low-risk populations whereas defending probably the most weak is “a dangerous fallacy unsupported by the scientific evidence.” That’s additionally some extent made by Kevin Kavanagh, MD, a member of Infection Control Today®’s Editorial Advisory Board in his rebuttal to the Declaration.

Kavanagh wrote that “for infection preventionists and frontline healthcare workers, the Great Barrington Declaration places their lives and livelihood at risk.”

The authors of the John Snow Memorandum come from a wide range of medical specialties together with public health, epidemiology, medication, pediatrics, sociology, virology, infectious illness, health methods, psychology, psychiatry, health coverage, and mathematical modeling.

In the memorandum, the authors communicate of success in some international locations who’ve employed COVID-19 containment methods.

“Japan, Vietnam, and New Zealand, to name a few countries, have shown that robust public health responses can control transmission, allowing life to return to near-normal, and there are many such success stories,” the authors wrote within the memorandum.

They additionally advocated for the continued method to attenuate threat of transmission. “The evidence is very clear: controlling community spread of COVID-19 is the best way to protect our societies and economies until safe and effective vaccines and therapeutics arrive within the coming months. We cannot afford distractions that undermine an effective response; it is essential that we act urgently based on the evidence.”

The memorandum authors did acknowledge that ongoing restrictions have understandably led to widespread demoralization and diminishing belief among the many public, and that within the face of a second wave of an infection there may be renewed curiosity in pure herd immunity approaches.

However, they are saying any pandemic administration technique relying upon immunity from pure infections for COVID-19 is flawed.

Back in August, Infection Control Today®’s sister publication, Contagion®, spoke to one of many declaration’s authors, Martin Kulldorff, PhD, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School & Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He spoke on various matters together with the age-targeted method to coping with COVID-19. To view that interview and study extra in regards to the declaration, click on here.

This story initially appeared inContagionLive!®

Source link

Load More Related Articles
Load More By David Smith
Load More In Health News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Multivitamins’ ‘benefits’ are all in your head: study

Multivitamins actually are magic tablets for your health, a brand new study contends—howev…